tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4301858713970951235.post717842804856098154..comments2023-10-30T03:51:34.555-05:00Comments on Planomenology: What is Planomenology?Reid Kotlashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03441149947128311281noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4301858713970951235.post-69551202411399982322007-03-31T11:40:00.000-05:002007-03-31T11:40:00.000-05:00The name really comes from poetic coincidence. It'...The name really comes from poetic coincidence. It's been bouncing around my mind for a while now, so I decided to put it to use. I don't have any strong commitment to Husserl, though I do count Heidegger as an influence (I agree about his originality, by the way). It's intended as more of a play on the term 'phenomenology' than a direct allusion to it.Reid Kotlashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03441149947128311281noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4301858713970951235.post-31378947521053911732007-03-31T10:35:00.000-05:002007-03-31T10:35:00.000-05:00Very interesting. I see the Deleuzian influence, b...Very interesting. I see the Deleuzian influence, but why make it sound like Husserl's phenomenology? You say it's not a method, so is that just coincidence? I.e. you have every intention to separate yourself from phenomenology (whose originality, esp. with the twist given to it by Heidegger, I think, is comparable with Deleuze's philosophy of difference.)Aleryandohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10430618700517224928noreply@blogger.com